<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Take Issue with Aluminum Market Hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/</link>
	<description>Sourcing &#38; Trading Intelligence for Global Metals Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:31:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gman</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-9986</link>
		<dc:creator>Gman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-9986</guid>
		<description>Look, there is 4.3 million mt of Al in LME warehouses, setting all time highs everyday.  Supply and demand suggest prices should DROP.  Read the news:  an individual, a company, or a group of individuals [I subscribe to this notion] are financially tying up stocks in the LME creating a squeeze.  Once the price moves to a point whereby all contracts clear, &#039;pop&#039;, another bubble.  Be careful.  Gremlins out there. Be careful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, there is 4.3 million mt of Al in LME warehouses, setting all time highs everyday.  Supply and demand suggest prices should DROP.  Read the news:  an individual, a company, or a group of individuals [I subscribe to this notion] are financially tying up stocks in the LME creating a squeeze.  Once the price moves to a point whereby all contracts clear, &#8216;pop&#8217;, another bubble.  Be careful.  Gremlins out there. Be careful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddy</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-7450</link>
		<dc:creator>eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 19:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-7450</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart,

Sorry for the delayed answer.  The point is that you base your sketisism on underlying industrial growth in China given your observation that electricity output is down year on year. Nevertheless, as pointed above that&#039;s not necesarily a valid point.

With respect to the We believe prices will take off toward $2,000 per mton after this period of consolidation is over, which could occur any time from today to September  the reference quoted, they meant and mean the consolidation process could last up top September and then the next upward leg toward $2,000 pe rmton will start. The idea they are trying to give is that the consolidation could last up to September. That is even clearer if one follows their reports. Up today, they have really hit it.

Have a great weekend !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart,</p>
<p>Sorry for the delayed answer.  The point is that you base your sketisism on underlying industrial growth in China given your observation that electricity output is down year on year. Nevertheless, as pointed above that&#8217;s not necesarily a valid point.</p>
<p>With respect to the We believe prices will take off toward $2,000 per mton after this period of consolidation is over, which could occur any time from today to September  the reference quoted, they meant and mean the consolidation process could last up top September and then the next upward leg toward $2,000 pe rmton will start. The idea they are trying to give is that the consolidation could last up to September. That is even clearer if one follows their reports. Up today, they have really hit it.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-6799</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-6799</guid>
		<description>Dear Eddy, I am not sure what point you are trying  to make with the last entry, Ms Wang appears to be saying you cannot really make any correlation from energy figures, positive, negative or neutral? 
As to the previous point about the Aluminium price, the exact quote from the report was &quot;We believe prices will take off toward $2,000 per mton after this period of consolidation is over, which could occur any time from today to September&quot; so longest time frame for consolidation is September - that was the only backstop given.
Anyway it has been an entertaining discussion Eddy, I hope you find our other material equally engaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Eddy, I am not sure what point you are trying  to make with the last entry, Ms Wang appears to be saying you cannot really make any correlation from energy figures, positive, negative or neutral?<br />
As to the previous point about the Aluminium price, the exact quote from the report was &#8220;We believe prices will take off toward $2,000 per mton after this period of consolidation is over, which could occur any time from today to September&#8221; so longest time frame for consolidation is September &#8211; that was the only backstop given.<br />
Anyway it has been an entertaining discussion Eddy, I hope you find our other material equally engaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDDY</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-6787</link>
		<dc:creator>EDDY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-6787</guid>
		<description>Gentleman, pls read below..I think the following explanation by UBS economist can help disipate confusion on electrcity trends in CHina. I quote from an interesting article in Forbes Asia:

&quot;Often economists look to electric power usage as a reality check. Some have asked how China&#039;s electricity consumption could have fallen in the first quarter of 2009 while industrial output rose, particularly as key heavy industries are power-guzzling. Power usage data is considered by some as being harder to manipulate. 
But UBS economist Tao Wang said, &quot;people believe there is a fixed correlation between growth of electricity consumption and GDP growth, but I think that correlation is quite unstable at times, and this is one of those times.&quot; Industrial power usage did slump less in March just as industrial output climbed much higher than expected. Services and household consumption helped prop up growth, while heavy industry was weak during the first quarter, she added. &quot;I don&#039;t see any real conflict between the profile for electricity production relative to usage and value-added industry data,&quot; Fishwick said. &quot;I think they match well enough given that they&#039;re never going to match perfectly.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentleman, pls read below..I think the following explanation by UBS economist can help disipate confusion on electrcity trends in CHina. I quote from an interesting article in Forbes Asia:</p>
<p>&#8220;Often economists look to electric power usage as a reality check. Some have asked how China&#8217;s electricity consumption could have fallen in the first quarter of 2009 while industrial output rose, particularly as key heavy industries are power-guzzling. Power usage data is considered by some as being harder to manipulate.<br />
But UBS economist Tao Wang said, &#8220;people believe there is a fixed correlation between growth of electricity consumption and GDP growth, but I think that correlation is quite unstable at times, and this is one of those times.&#8221; Industrial power usage did slump less in March just as industrial output climbed much higher than expected. Services and household consumption helped prop up growth, while heavy industry was weak during the first quarter, she added. &#8220;I don&#8217;t see any real conflict between the profile for electricity production relative to usage and value-added industry data,&#8221; Fishwick said. &#8220;I think they match well enough given that they&#8217;re never going to match perfectly.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddy</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-6772</link>
		<dc:creator>eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-6772</guid>
		<description>Stuart,

Beyond SRB stockpiling , which again evidence clearly shows is  just one factor behind the increase in demand, there is no evidence of stockpiling. All the contrary, aluminum inventories reported by the SHFE are sharply down so far this year. Can you offer evidence of oversupply or private stockpiling? In fact latest PMI data for China (March) shows inventories at manufacturing falling.

Now you say electricity is down &quot;due to a general reduction in nearly all manufacturing&quot;, but you are wrong there, latest data for Industrial production (March) shows growth (not declines) just as the PMI survey from China for March also showed growth in production and new orders. Chinese falling aluminum output is intensifying not reversing, just as the data from the IAI showed today. It is the most energy intesive aluminum industry. It does helps explains the fall in electricity demand.

Again, In my view you are missing the point because your not analyzing the data yourself but probably relying on what other analysts say. Data shows yes an uptick in imports but also in consuption (reatail sales, housing, autos, electrical, packaging). 

With respect to the refered report, their price forecast is near $2,000 per mton by the end of the year (after the period of consolidation that could last until September). The ortodox and &quot;respected&quot; analysts you refered  were the same ones that were expecting prices above $3,000 per mton or higher for this year just last September. Those guys seem to be Bi-Polar in my view, just extrapolating the trend.

Guys, I enjoy the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart,</p>
<p>Beyond SRB stockpiling , which again evidence clearly shows is  just one factor behind the increase in demand, there is no evidence of stockpiling. All the contrary, aluminum inventories reported by the SHFE are sharply down so far this year. Can you offer evidence of oversupply or private stockpiling? In fact latest PMI data for China (March) shows inventories at manufacturing falling.</p>
<p>Now you say electricity is down &#8220;due to a general reduction in nearly all manufacturing&#8221;, but you are wrong there, latest data for Industrial production (March) shows growth (not declines) just as the PMI survey from China for March also showed growth in production and new orders. Chinese falling aluminum output is intensifying not reversing, just as the data from the IAI showed today. It is the most energy intesive aluminum industry. It does helps explains the fall in electricity demand.</p>
<p>Again, In my view you are missing the point because your not analyzing the data yourself but probably relying on what other analysts say. Data shows yes an uptick in imports but also in consuption (reatail sales, housing, autos, electrical, packaging). </p>
<p>With respect to the refered report, their price forecast is near $2,000 per mton by the end of the year (after the period of consolidation that could last until September). The ortodox and &#8220;respected&#8221; analysts you refered  were the same ones that were expecting prices above $3,000 per mton or higher for this year just last September. Those guys seem to be Bi-Polar in my view, just extrapolating the trend.</p>
<p>Guys, I enjoy the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Go-greener &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Take Issue with Aluminum Market Hype</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-6737</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Go-greener &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Take Issue with Aluminum Market Hype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-6737</guid>
		<description>[...] AnAtheist.Net placed an interesting blog post on We Take Issue with Aluminum Market HypeHere&#8217;s a brief overviewMoreover, other economic indicators tell us power consumption and steel prices remain flat to down and the economy with its 5.8% growth rate&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AnAtheist.Net placed an interesting blog post on We Take Issue with Aluminum Market HypeHere&#8217;s a brief overviewMoreover, other economic indicators tell us power consumption and steel prices remain flat to down and the economy with its 5.8% growth rate&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-6702</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-6702</guid>
		<description>Dear Eddy, thank you for your comments and opinion, even if it is misguided. We took issue with the interpretation that an increase in imports is the same as an increase in demand, clearly it is not. The metal imports purchased by the SRB and other state enterprises are going straight into store, they do not represent an increase in demand. On the issue of power consumption I dont think we can attribute the downturn in power consumption across China just to the idling of aluminium capacity, it is due to a general reduction in nearly all manufacturing. As to how much this is due to a reduction in exports and how much is due to a reduction in domestic consumption we would not like to say, if we are inclined to agree with your position on any point it is that most of the decline is probably in export industries but as this represents a large part of China&#039;s GDP it will continue to have a depressing effect on the country&#039;s growth for some time to come. Specifically on Aluminium we took issue with the original article&#039;s proposition that Aluminium would reach $2000/metric ton by September this year - we can&#039;t see that and neither I should add have any other reputable bank or broker research firms.
Thank you  anyway for your comments, it is always a pleasure to see our article generate some lively debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Eddy, thank you for your comments and opinion, even if it is misguided. We took issue with the interpretation that an increase in imports is the same as an increase in demand, clearly it is not. The metal imports purchased by the SRB and other state enterprises are going straight into store, they do not represent an increase in demand. On the issue of power consumption I dont think we can attribute the downturn in power consumption across China just to the idling of aluminium capacity, it is due to a general reduction in nearly all manufacturing. As to how much this is due to a reduction in exports and how much is due to a reduction in domestic consumption we would not like to say, if we are inclined to agree with your position on any point it is that most of the decline is probably in export industries but as this represents a large part of China&#8217;s GDP it will continue to have a depressing effect on the country&#8217;s growth for some time to come. Specifically on Aluminium we took issue with the original article&#8217;s proposition that Aluminium would reach $2000/metric ton by September this year &#8211; we can&#8217;t see that and neither I should add have any other reputable bank or broker research firms.<br />
Thank you  anyway for your comments, it is always a pleasure to see our article generate some lively debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/04/20/we-take-issue-with-aluminum-market-hype/#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen,

I disagree and think you contradict and are confused. I have read the report you refer to.

Global aluminum demand has increased around 17% in China since Dec, given SRB stockpiling (yes), but also orders from construction, auto sector, electric grid system, packaging and re-stocking. Retail sales, auto sales, housing starts, imports of oil, copper, aluminum are at record highs (have you see the data?). Electricity output is down precisely because aluminum output is down still around 4 million tons in an annualize basis (haven you read about how electric companies are offering lower prices to smelters in order to incentive them to restart output and increase their demand of electricity?) . China clearly shows today a similar economic profile it had before the LB Bankruptcy (except to the revival of its experts given still depressed demand in the western world).

Now, if you disagree with the refered report and think the price rally has no substance, why then you don&#039;t see new lows and do agree entirely with their prognosis that price will range trade between $1,300-1,600 per mton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen,</p>
<p>I disagree and think you contradict and are confused. I have read the report you refer to.</p>
<p>Global aluminum demand has increased around 17% in China since Dec, given SRB stockpiling (yes), but also orders from construction, auto sector, electric grid system, packaging and re-stocking. Retail sales, auto sales, housing starts, imports of oil, copper, aluminum are at record highs (have you see the data?). Electricity output is down precisely because aluminum output is down still around 4 million tons in an annualize basis (haven you read about how electric companies are offering lower prices to smelters in order to incentive them to restart output and increase their demand of electricity?) . China clearly shows today a similar economic profile it had before the LB Bankruptcy (except to the revival of its experts given still depressed demand in the western world).</p>
<p>Now, if you disagree with the refered report and think the price rally has no substance, why then you don&#8217;t see new lows and do agree entirely with their prognosis that price will range trade between $1,300-1,600 per mton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: agmetalminer.com @ 2012-05-22 21:42:01 -->
