<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steel Imports Cause Low Utilization Rates According to Steel Mills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/</link>
	<description>Sourcing &#38; Trading Intelligence for Global Metals Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:31:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Industry Arguments Behind China Steel Anti Dumping Cases</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/comment-page-1/#comment-8704</link>
		<dc:creator>Industry Arguments Behind China Steel Anti Dumping Cases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/#comment-8704</guid>
		<description>[...] an article on the subject of steel imports and their effect on domestic mill utilization rates. The focus of the article had countered the industry&#039;s assertion, quoted in a Purchasing.com article, that imports caused [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an article on the subject of steel imports and their effect on domestic mill utilization rates. The focus of the article had countered the industry&#8217;s assertion, quoted in a Purchasing.com article, that imports caused [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetalMiner Generates Controversy Regarding Steel Imports</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/comment-page-1/#comment-8574</link>
		<dc:creator>MetalMiner Generates Controversy Regarding Steel Imports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/#comment-8574</guid>
		<description>[...] And in that mission, we often take strong points of view like we did last week in this post:  Steel Imports Cause Low Utilization Rates According to Steel Mills. And that post prompted a response from one of America&#039;s best-known and arguably best-run steel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And in that mission, we often take strong points of view like we did last week in this post:  Steel Imports Cause Low Utilization Rates According to Steel Mills. And that post prompted a response from one of America&#8217;s best-known and arguably best-run steel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky Griggs</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/comment-page-1/#comment-8376</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky Griggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/#comment-8376</guid>
		<description>Mr. Burns:

I am the General Manager of Nucor&#039;s Birmingham, Alabama steel mill. I am writing to you in regards to the above mentioned article that you recently authored. Indeed, imports have fallen significantly as you report about 50%. Current domestic utilization rates are at about 40% and falling fast !!! Imports as a percent of domestic consumption are on the rise ! Laws and trade agreements are only important to the discussion when and only when they are enforced ! Just because we have trade laws in the U.S. doesn&#039;t mean that our trading partners will play by the rules. As a matter of fact, our trade laws are so typically cumbersome, an industry has to be literally in the Grave before any trade action may be enacted. Just look at the steel industry over the last 25 years. More than 30% of U.S. steel making capacity went bankrupt within this time period. From 2005 through 2008 U.S. consumption of steel was ~130 Million tons/yr. U.S. steel making capacity during this time period was at ~110 Million tons. Why didn&#039;t we build more capacity? There was, and still is, a global glut of steel making capacity, and China, the worlds trading partner is continuing to add capacity!! Are the Chinese much more productive than the U.S.? No !!! At Nucor, we produce ~3000 tons of steel per steel making employee, possibly the most productive steel company in the world! Just 12 months ago, the U.S. steel industry employed ~120,000 people. Does China produce steel cheaper than we can? Yes !! But only through significant government subsidization, currency manipulation, export tax rebates, import tariffs, less than life sustaining wage structures, lax environmental regulation enforcement, little concern for human safetyÃ‚Â¦.the list goes on and on. The Chinese spit in the face of their commitment to the WTO on a daily basis and threaten us with trade restrictions (HA HAÃ‚Â¦.what a threat). How do we, the U.S. steel industry, justify capacity expansion in the U.S. when we will have to compete with other Governments that build industries on an export platform????? The only people with the gumption to add significant capacity in the U.S. are the Germans and the Russians!!!!!! This They do only because they have never operated in an economy as open as the U.S. economy !!!  They will find out soon enough.

By the way, there is no way that Nucor exported steel prior to having met our domestic customers&#039; needs first !!!!!!! That insinuation, I find, extremely insulting. 

p.s. without imports the US industrial machine would have been starved of material Ã¢â‚¬Å“ to the detriment of the whole economy Ã‚Â¦Ã‚Â¦..that economy of which you speak was a false economy !! We might have seen fewer bankruptcies and less financial pain if this false economy had not been served by dumped imports !

 
Kindest Regards

Franky Griggs
VP&amp;GM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Burns:</p>
<p>I am the General Manager of Nucor&#8217;s Birmingham, Alabama steel mill. I am writing to you in regards to the above mentioned article that you recently authored. Indeed, imports have fallen significantly as you report about 50%. Current domestic utilization rates are at about 40% and falling fast !!! Imports as a percent of domestic consumption are on the rise ! Laws and trade agreements are only important to the discussion when and only when they are enforced ! Just because we have trade laws in the U.S. doesn&#8217;t mean that our trading partners will play by the rules. As a matter of fact, our trade laws are so typically cumbersome, an industry has to be literally in the Grave before any trade action may be enacted. Just look at the steel industry over the last 25 years. More than 30% of U.S. steel making capacity went bankrupt within this time period. From 2005 through 2008 U.S. consumption of steel was ~130 Million tons/yr. U.S. steel making capacity during this time period was at ~110 Million tons. Why didn&#8217;t we build more capacity? There was, and still is, a global glut of steel making capacity, and China, the worlds trading partner is continuing to add capacity!! Are the Chinese much more productive than the U.S.? No !!! At Nucor, we produce ~3000 tons of steel per steel making employee, possibly the most productive steel company in the world! Just 12 months ago, the U.S. steel industry employed ~120,000 people. Does China produce steel cheaper than we can? Yes !! But only through significant government subsidization, currency manipulation, export tax rebates, import tariffs, less than life sustaining wage structures, lax environmental regulation enforcement, little concern for human safetyÃ‚Â¦.the list goes on and on. The Chinese spit in the face of their commitment to the WTO on a daily basis and threaten us with trade restrictions (HA HAÃ‚Â¦.what a threat). How do we, the U.S. steel industry, justify capacity expansion in the U.S. when we will have to compete with other Governments that build industries on an export platform????? The only people with the gumption to add significant capacity in the U.S. are the Germans and the Russians!!!!!! This They do only because they have never operated in an economy as open as the U.S. economy !!!  They will find out soon enough.</p>
<p>By the way, there is no way that Nucor exported steel prior to having met our domestic customers&#8217; needs first !!!!!!! That insinuation, I find, extremely insulting. </p>
<p>p.s. without imports the US industrial machine would have been starved of material Ã¢â‚¬Å“ to the detriment of the whole economy Ã‚Â¦Ã‚Â¦..that economy of which you speak was a false economy !! We might have seen fewer bankruptcies and less financial pain if this false economy had not been served by dumped imports !</p>
<p>Kindest Regards</p>
<p>Franky Griggs<br />
VP&#038;GM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/comment-page-1/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/05/13/steel-imports-cause-low-utilization-tates-according-to-steel-mills/#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>&quot;Steel Imports Cause Low Utilization Rates According to Steel Mills&quot;

We know that in Southern Ontario. US Steel is now importing steel instead of making it here. Imports have replaced  production at two domestic mills and shut them down completely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Steel Imports Cause Low Utilization Rates According to Steel Mills&#8221;</p>
<p>We know that in Southern Ontario. US Steel is now importing steel instead of making it here. Imports have replaced  production at two domestic mills and shut them down completely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: agmetalminer.com @ 2012-05-23 06:38:25 -->
