<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Coal Fired Power Stations be the Answer to Global Warming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agmetalminer.com/2009/06/30/could-coal-fired-power-stations-be-the-answer-to-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/06/30/could-coal-fired-power-stations-be-the-answer-to-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Sourcing &#38; Trading Intelligence for Global Metals Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:31:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blakeslee</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/06/30/could-coal-fired-power-stations-be-the-answer-to-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-11759</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/06/30/could-coal-fired-power-stations-be-the-answer-to-global-warming/#comment-11759</guid>
		<description>Our existing coal plants may well be the short-term solution to our problems. They can easily be converted to burn clean, carbon neutral biomass.  The cost is actually reduced while carbon capture will double costs.
www.clrlight.org/CleanCoal.htm
www.clrlight.org/BiomassCoal.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our existing coal plants may well be the short-term solution to our problems. They can easily be converted to burn clean, carbon neutral biomass.  The cost is actually reduced while carbon capture will double costs.<br />
<a href="http://www.clrlight.org/CleanCoal.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.clrlight.org/CleanCoal.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.clrlight.org/BiomassCoal.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.clrlight.org/BiomassCoal.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Arnold</title>
		<link>http://agmetalminer.com/2009/06/30/could-coal-fired-power-stations-be-the-answer-to-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-11701</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agmetalminer.com/2009/06/30/could-coal-fired-power-stations-be-the-answer-to-global-warming/#comment-11701</guid>
		<description>Any carbon diet strategy would be dependent upon clean coal:

&quot;The vast majority of new power stations in China and India will be coal-fired; not &quot;may be coal-fired&quot;; will be. So developing carbon capture and storage technology is not optional, it is literally of the essence.&quot; --&quot;Breaking the Climate Deadlock,&quot; Tony Blair, June 26, 2008

But, Vaclav Smil, an energy expert at the University of Manitoba, has estimated that capturing and burying just 10 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted over a year from coal-fire plants at current rates would require moving volumes of compressed carbon dioxide greater than the total annual flow of oil worldwide -- a massive undertaking requiring decades and trillions of dollars. &quot;Beware of the scale,&quot; he stressed.&quot;

China has one of the largest coal reserves in the world, and coal accounts for 67% of its primary energy use, compared with 24% for the world average. China is currently bringing two additional coal-fired power plants to the electric power grid every week. In a hypothetical scenario in which carbon intensity keeps pace with a GDP growth rate of 7%, by 2030, China would be emitting as much as the world as a whole is today (8 GtC/year) --Ning Zeng et al., Science, 8 February 2008

&quot;Contrary to the conventional wisdom that China is outpacing the rest of the world in building coal plants, the International Energy Agency has projected that between 2011 and 2020 the OECD (most of Europe plus the  U.S.), with 150 million fewer people than China, will build 10 percent more coal capacity than China (184 GW for the OECD vs. 168 GW for China).&quot; --&quot;Schwarzenegger&#039;s folly,&quot; Gristmill, 16 Oct 2008

&quot;The alternative (to geoengineering) is the acceptance of a massive natural cull of humanity and a return to an Earth that freely regulates itself but in the hot state.&quot; --Dr James Lovelock, August 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any carbon diet strategy would be dependent upon clean coal:</p>
<p>&#8220;The vast majority of new power stations in China and India will be coal-fired; not &#8220;may be coal-fired&#8221;; will be. So developing carbon capture and storage technology is not optional, it is literally of the essence.&#8221; &#8211;&#8221;Breaking the Climate Deadlock,&#8221; Tony Blair, June 26, 2008</p>
<p>But, Vaclav Smil, an energy expert at the University of Manitoba, has estimated that capturing and burying just 10 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted over a year from coal-fire plants at current rates would require moving volumes of compressed carbon dioxide greater than the total annual flow of oil worldwide &#8212; a massive undertaking requiring decades and trillions of dollars. &#8220;Beware of the scale,&#8221; he stressed.&#8221;</p>
<p>China has one of the largest coal reserves in the world, and coal accounts for 67% of its primary energy use, compared with 24% for the world average. China is currently bringing two additional coal-fired power plants to the electric power grid every week. In a hypothetical scenario in which carbon intensity keeps pace with a GDP growth rate of 7%, by 2030, China would be emitting as much as the world as a whole is today (8 GtC/year) &#8211;Ning Zeng et al., Science, 8 February 2008</p>
<p>&#8220;Contrary to the conventional wisdom that China is outpacing the rest of the world in building coal plants, the International Energy Agency has projected that between 2011 and 2020 the OECD (most of Europe plus the  U.S.), with 150 million fewer people than China, will build 10 percent more coal capacity than China (184 GW for the OECD vs. 168 GW for China).&#8221; &#8211;&#8221;Schwarzenegger&#8217;s folly,&#8221; Gristmill, 16 Oct 2008</p>
<p>&#8220;The alternative (to geoengineering) is the acceptance of a massive natural cull of humanity and a return to an Earth that freely regulates itself but in the hot state.&#8221; &#8211;Dr James Lovelock, August 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: agmetalminer.com @ 2012-05-23 07:32:40 -->
