Military Grade Aluminum? The Ford F-150 Debate Continues

by on

No greater debate has ever roiled our virtual pages than the one about Ford Motor Company and its use of the term “military-grade aluminum.” This post from last May is just one of several posts we have written about Ford’s ad campaign for the aluminum-bodied F-150 pickup and all not only rank high in our site stats but also seem to draw the most commenters willing to lend their expertise that, mostly, rejects Ford’s use of the term.

Enjoy this look back and feel free to post if you have any strong feelings about “military-grade” yourself as we look back at the year that was. — Jeff Yoders, editor

No term has brought up more discussion in the pages of MetalMiner than Ford Motor Company‘s insistence that the F-150 pickup truck is made of “military grade” aluminum.

MetalMiner Price Benchmarking: Current and Historical Prices for the Metals You Buy

On this Memorial Day, we thought we’d revisit whether military grade was actually a specification or a simple marketing ploy on Ford’s part. Since the aluminum-bodied F-150 was introduced in the 2015 model year, more information about its actual construction has been shared by Ford.

Individual dealers are now touting the strength and research that went into the cab and other body parts of the F-150. “Military grade” is still sprinkled throughout the the video, but they also concede the alloy is also part magnesium and silicon. Ford also mentions that a large portion of the F-150 is, in fact, high-strength steel.

Ford has also admitted that the F-150 is primarily built from 6,000 series aluminum alloy, the strength of which is increased by heat-treating after it is formed.

The “military grade” refers to the specs that military applications of 6,000 series alloy is used in. In fairness to Ford, manufacturers and fabricators have been promoting their products as “military grade” for decades, and that’s really no different than Ford’s use of the term.

Two-Month Trial: Metal Buying Outlook

We certainly wouldn’t recommend that anyone take an aluminum-bodied F-150 into a war zone to test just how “military grade” it really is, but, from a specification standpoint, Ford seems to have good reason to be proud of the rigor of the processes it uses to produce the F-150.

Comments (7)

  1. David says:

    As a metals distributer and consultant that has done business with the military and military subcontractors for 45 years

    This is a marketing ploy All alumnium grades have multiple specifications from many agencies to cover all applications from commercial to aerospace

    The same grade can be used from a purely commercial non critical use to military and aerospace

    When one speaks of military grade. The severe applications use 7000 series aluminum and not 6000

    And naval military applications use 5000 series but each series has multiple chemical compositions that are critical for end use

    And even more critical is the Temper

    This is a blatant marketing ploy to confuses the consumer

    But what is most important is the

  2. Bill says:

    Can confirm what David is saying. I’m a stress analyst in the aerospace industry and these commercials annoy me to no end. I’ve worked on many projects for the DOD over the years and have never heard of military grade alloys. Aluminum alloys are aluminum alloys. Like every other metal they’re listed in Mil Handbook 5 (the historical name for the mmpds) but the military doesn’t mandate any better properties than any other industry. And if they are using 6000 series then that’s not even that strong. 6000 series alloys are typically selected for corrosion and weld ability. 7000 are your strongest alloys or 2000 for fatigue-critical applications. I’m sure Ford engineers are competent enough to pick the right alloy for their application but they’re not doing anything special here. Make the truck out of Titanium, maraging steel, and/or composites if you really want to brag about something.

  3. Chuck Ross (RCAF Ret) says:

    Most of the arguments I’ve read fail to discriminate between a ” specification”, a “standard” and a “grade.” That said, after almost 40 years in the manufacturing, repair, maintenance and overhaul of military aerospace products ( read : airplanes painted gray), they ain’t no such thing as military grade anything. A specification guided by a standard will identify a material developed by the industry and accorded the characteristics needed and an appropriate identification assigned by the responsible body ( eg SAE, ASTM, etc).
    I wish Ford would quit messing with our understsnding and just advertise the truth and tell us if the truck is made from 5XXX, 6XXX or whatever cheap tin they’re using now. GMC FOREVER (oops- a little parochialism there!)

  4. R. L. Hails Sr. P. E. (ret.) says:

    This is just salemanship, nothing more. If you are a huge buyer of anything and have an engineering expertise, it is more efficient when purchasing, to draft a standard for your specification(s). The Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE, have a number of standards, common to this industry. The biggie is ASTM but military specs are close as they buy billions of dollars of things. There probably is a military grade rubber band.

    Engineers use the appropriate grade for their design purposes. The big issue is Ford’s use of aluminum as a replacement for steel. It is a common design decision between trade offs, e.g. will not rust, light weight, less strength than some steels. (Aluminum is an amazing metal with wide ranging material properties.)

    The question for the civilian buyer is whether the decision was a good one, or not for me.

  5. Tannim says:

    Who really cares? Besides Ford for their marketing and GM for their jealousy and garbage trucks and inane advertising?

    Bottom line is Ford is still the superior product.

  6. i thinks so Individual dealers are now touting the strength and research that went into the cab and other body parts of the F-150.

  7. Michael says:

    Does the Aluminum in the Ford F-150 meet the standards for any of the specifications for military equipment?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *