Price Drivers for Steel Compared to Copper

In a recent note to investors on equity investments in the metals and mining segments Credit Suisse made a very interesting analysis as to the relative merits of investments in steel and metals as opposed to mining companies producing the raw materials that go into those industries.

The bank states that commodity demand is back to where it was in volume terms before the crash of 2008. For example in 2007 the world consumed around 18mt copper split 5mt China 13mt ex China. Now its around 7mt and 11mt – same global size very different split. Globally, steel production is back to pre-crisis levels but again capacity under utilization in the west has been compensated by significant new capacity running at higher levels in Asia.

Data from Worldsteel replicated by Credit Suisse

The bank observes that mining is largely a global market whereas steel is a mixture of regional and global. Some specific observations are:

  1. On the cost side, steel-making costs are in part driven by the location of the mill, so developed-world steel makers will naturally have a higher fixed cost base relative to developing world peers. As such the cost curve is in favor of developing world producers.
  2. On the metals / mining side, other than processed metals such as aluminum, costs tend to be where the deposits are found (generally low cost nations) or in minerals such as iron ore, the grade and quality is the key driver of the cost, not the cost of the labor base.
  3. On the revenue side, in general non ferrous metals trade at a global price, often linked to exchanges such as the LME
  4. Steel pricing is far more opaque and regionally driven. While the effective regional “spot price is more or less a global price driven by the US$ export price; local contract pricing (and in the developed world up to 50% of steel is sold on contract) will be dependent upon customer relationships and burden sharing, as well as domestic utilization rates.

Because steel mills ex China are typically running at only 75% capacity they have limited ability to pass on rising raw material costs. If as expected China returns to steel growth next year this will maintain upward pressure on raw material costs and downward pressure on global steel prices. This will apply for all products where China has a surplus such as aluminum, steel and stainless, the upside for finished metals prices remains limited.

As this graph shows steel prices have consistently underperformed relative to copper prices during the last five years, and producers earnings would reflect this.

Data from Worldsteel replicated by Credit Suisse

The analysis was run to illustrate the advantages of investments in mining companies rather than steel companies but the conclusions apply equally to probable moves in metals prices. Even if Asian demand drives prices for iron ore, coking coal and so on higher it will not automatically lead to equivalent price rises in finished metal costs. For products like steel producers in the west, suffering from over capacity will be the one’s squeezed but for metals like copper, that are globally priced, price increases will pass directly through to consumers.

–Stuart Burns

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top