One question we often field from readers is this one: “how are other companies buying their X and how well are we buying X?” We have previously written that many buying organizations fall into one of several different “buy” scenarios that include the following:
- The pure spot buyer (e.g. otherwise known as 3 bids in a box): Here, the buying organization goes out to market with a specific requirement, obtains three bids and typically places the award with the most competitive supplier who can meet delivery and quality requirements.
- The contract buyer: Prefers nearly the opposite type arrangement. He or she likes to “lock in” all or close to all known requirements or use some formula based on 80% of last year’s demand. The contract buyer often uses a price contracting mechanism known as an index whereby the price adjusts quarterly or monthly to the index depending on the agreed-upon arrangement.
- The hybrid buyer: This buyer is more strategic in that he/she buys both on the spot market and also contracts for forward buys or hedges when prices warrant that action.
Pros and cons exist for each scenario. Often times, the contract buyer in scenario two actually looks more like the spot buyer in scenario one because when a buying organization uses an index like CRU Group‘s, they do, in fact, pay the market price. They don’t actually pay less than the market or avoid a cost run-up if prices rise. In that sense, the scenario two buyer is actually a spot buyer — ultimately paying the market price.
We’d argue there are tools today that allow the buying organization to take their metals purchasing to the next level. Innovative practices such as benchmarking can actually allow the buying organization to reduce its average or budgeted purchase price. Let’s see how.
There are a number of ways to this. We have identified a few below:
- By benchmarking your company’s current monthly metal spend, and by doing so regularly, buying organizations can walk into a supplier negotiation armed with current market price data and knowledge of how well the company buys vis-à-vis the market. Access to superior metal price intelligence gives the buying organization a leg up in negotiations and the ability to lower costs.
- By pairing the benchmark report with forecasting, buying organizations can better time contract purchases both to avoid significant price increases as well as to “float” when prices are dropping. In this way, the buying organization can apply a more strategic hybrid approach to metals purchasing thereby lowering average costs.
- Think of benchmarking as laser surgery. Buying organizations now have the means of pinpointing specific SKU-level opportunity areas while leaving other areas untouched.
- Stop wasting time on metal sourcing projects that have little to no ROI. Conversely, identify high-ROI metal sourcing projects. Educate your executive team with where and how the procurement organization plans on creating value within some of the largest metals purchase areas.
- Conduct alternative supplier identification on the fly by seeing alternative suppliers within your geography for the form/alloy/grade/size you buy. By conducting these types of analyses quickly and efficiently the long cycle time of implementing savings can be streamlined and shortened.
Try Benchmarking for free with self-service!
Bonus benefit: improve your ISO certification scores by using benchmarking, which enables a fact-based approach to decision-making, a key requirement of certification.
The most innovative metal buying organizations will become the early adopters of this type of benchmarking capability. Just as Progressive Insurance and Kelley Blue Book created market access to greater pricing visibility, metal price transparency appears within reach. This innovation should significantly improve metal buying strategies.