The Department of Commerce started investigations of imports of carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Belarus, Italy, South Korea, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom, and companion countervailing duty investigations of imports of carbon and alloy steel wire rod from Italy and Turkey. The investigations cover hot-rolled products of carbon and alloy steel.
The alleged dumping margins range from 18.89% (Italy) to 756.93% (Russia) and both of the alleged countervailing subsidies are above de minimis (less than 2%). The U.S. International Trade Commission is scheduled to make its preliminary injury determinations on or before May 12, 2017.
The petitioners are Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc. in Florida, Nucor Corporation based in North Carolina, Keystone Consolidated Industries of Texas, and Charter Steel in Wisconsin.
President Donald Trump (R-N.Y.) is set to sign an executive order this afternoon ordering enforcement and review of the H-1B visa program, popular in the technology industry, on a visit to the headquarters of Snap-On Inc., a tool manufacturer in Kenosha, Wis., according to senior administration officials.
He will also use what the White House called the “Buy American and Hire American” order to seek changes in government procurement that would boost purchases of American products in federal contracts, with one aim being to help U.S. steelmakers.
The moves show Trump once again using his power to issue executive orders to try to fulfill promises he made last year in his election campaign, in this case to reform U.S. immigration policies and encourage purchases of American products.
“Strong Buy America domestic procurement preferences for federally funded infrastructure projects are vital to the health of the domestic steel industry, and have helped create manufacturing jobs and build American infrastructure,” said Thomas J. Gibson, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute, the largest trade group for North American steel manufacturers. “The foundation of a strong Buy America program is the longstanding requirement that all iron and steel-making processes occur in the U.S. for a product to be Buy America compliant — from the actual steel production to the finishing processes. This ‘melted and poured’ standard has been successfully applied since 1983 and must continue to be the standard used in federal Buy America rules for steel procurement. We applaud President Trump for affirming his commitment to full and effective enforcement of our Buy America laws, and to addressing the issue of unfairly dumped and subsidized steel, in signing this Executive Order today.”
Arconic Inc. said today that Klaus Kleinfeld has stepped down as chairman and chief executive officer, leaving the specialty metals company after heavy pressure from activist investor Elliott Management Corp.
Kleinfeld’s departure came after he sent an unauthorized letter to Elliott Management that Arconic’s board said showed poor judgement. The internal battle between Kleinfeld and Elliott had been going on ever since the company was created by a split with the commodity aluminum production half of what used to be Alcoa, Inc., that company is now Alcoa, Corp.
Kleinfeld was appointed CEO of Alcoa, Inc. in May 2008 and shepherded the combined company through the commodities down-cycle. Leaving with Arconic was supposed to be a path to consistently higher profits, without the threat of commodity cycles harming the bottom line. But, as we have noted before, Alcoa Corp. has been flying high along with all other commodity aluminum producers ever since while Arconic has not been able to take advantage of the higher price of commodity-grade products.
The Trump administration is moving to rewrite Obama-era rules limiting water pollution from coal-fired power plants. Scott Pruitt , the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency , sent a letter announcing his decision to a coalition of energy companies that lobbied against the 2015 water pollution regulations.
The EPA’s regulations would have required utilities, by next year, to cut the amounts of toxic heavy metals in the wastewater piped from their plants into rivers and lakes often used as sources of drinking water. Arsenic, lead and mercury and other potentially harmful contaminates leach from massive pits of waterlogged ash left behind after burning coal to generate electricity.
The Utility Water Act Group petitioned Pruitt last month to reverse course on the regulations, which they claim would result in plant closures and job losses. Pruitt responded Wednesday, saying he would delay compliance with the rule while EPA reconsiders the restrictions. EPA will also request that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit freeze ongoing lawsuits filed over the rules by energy companies.
17 Of the 18 manufacturing industries tracked by the Institute for Supply Management’s index of national factory activity reported growth and no industry reported a contraction last month. Buyers still might want to beware as metal markets are showing more pull-backs than we witnessed in March, despite the overall bullish behavior across the entire industrial metals complex.
Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross recently announced the final results of an annual administrative review of the anti-dumping duty order on imports of oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea (South Korea). Commerce found that Korean steel producers have been unfairly dumping OCTG in the U.S. market, hurting American workers and businesses.
Commerce announced, in a press release, that it is exercising its authority under Congress for the first time to address market distortions in the production of foreign merchandise, and to calculate dumping margins that “more accurately account for the unfair pricing practices of foreign exporters. Section 504 of the Trade Preferences Extension of 2015 is a vital instrument in helping to identify distortions in the market that can enable and facilitate dumping practices.”
During the period covered by the administrative review (July 2014 to August 2015), OCTG imports from South Korea were valued at an estimated $1.1 billion, accounting for nearly 25% of all U.S. imports of OCTG. The dumping margins, or the rate at which the imported materials were under sold below fair value in the U.S., were found to range from 2.76% to 24.9%.
A 24.92%t tariff rate was imposed on OCTG from Nexteel, 2.76% on SeAh Steel and 13.84% on Hyundai Steel and other South Korean steelmakers.
The review also concluded that prices of the hot-rolled coil used to produce OCTG, as well as Korean electricity prices, were distorted. Anti-dumping tariffs on Nexteel and Hyundai each increased 16.88% and 7.92%, respectively, during this review. The initial preliminary rulings and the lower percentages were announced last October.
Seah Steel, however, saw a 1.04% reduction, making it the only South Korean steelmaker that was levied a lower tariff rate.
“There is fair and unfair trade, and the distinction is not very hard to make,” Secretary Ross said in the release. “We will not stand for the distortions in foreign markets being used against U.S. businesses. The Trump Administration will continue to employ all of the tools provided under the law to take swift action against harmful trade practices from foreign nations attempting to take advantage of our markets, workers, and businesses.”
China will offer the Trump administration better market access for financial sector investments and U.S. beef exports to help avert a trade war, the Financial Times reported on Sunday, citing officials familiar with the matter.
China is prepared to raise the investment ceiling in the Bilateral Investment treaty and is also willing to end the ban on U.S. beef imports, the newspaper also reported.
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said on Friday that President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have agreed to a new 100-day plan for trade talks on Friday.
Steel Shipments Down in February, But Up Year-Over-Year
The American Iron and Steel Institute recently said that for the month of February 2017, U.S. steel mills shipped 7,232,341 net tons, a 6.2% decrease from the 7,708,416 nt shipped in the previous month, and a 2.4% increase from the 7,059,442 nt shipped in February 2016. Shipments year-to-date in 2017 are 14,940,757 nt, a 6% increase vs. 2016 shipments of 14,090,749 nt for two months.
A comparison of February shipments to the previous month of January shows the following changes: hot rolled sheets, down 3%, hot-dipped galvanized sheets and strip, down 6% and cold-rolled sheets, down 8%.
The efficiency with which China’s solar products convert sunlight into electricity is increasingly close to that of panels made by American, German and South Korean companies. Because China also buys half of the world’s new solar panels, the country now effectively controls the panel market.
A recent New York Times article details the meteoric rise of China’s solar industry and how its dominance in growing markets complicates the Trump administration’s attempts to cut down the U.S. trade deficit with China. China’s policy shifts and business decisions now have global impact on solar prices and production, particularly of crystalline polysilicon photovoltaic panels, everywhere else in the world.
Now that China is cutting subsidies that it offers to panel manufacturers there, the ripples are being felt by installers in the U.S. and elsewhere. China’s solar-panel makers have recently cut their prices by more than a quarter, sending global prices plummeting. The NYT reports that Western companies have found themselves unable to compete. They have cut jobs from Germany to Michigan to Texas and the account includes the case of Russell Abney, a 49-year-old equipment engineer from Perrysburg, Ohio. The American panel manufacturer he worked for laid off Abney, among others, to remain competitive after China yanked its subsidies and manufacturers there lowered domestic prices to compensate.
If China’s dominance of solar panel manufacturing remains, able to move markets and cause layoffs worldwide depending on which subsidies are continued and which are scrapped, then the solar panel silicon market is likely to remain in the low-price rut we’ve documented in the Renewables MMI since 2012.
The Renewables MMI fell one point to 54 this month.
Actual Renewables Prices
Chinese silicon fell .3% to $1,756.13 a metric ton this month from $1,761.77/mt last month. U.S. Steel plate increased 7% to $771 a ton this month from $723/ton last month.
U.S. Mining for rare earths is rapidly falling behind China, a trend that “limits our growth, our competitiveness and our national security,” Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairwoman Lisa Murkowski (R.-Alaska) said recently.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, imports in 2016 represented more than 50% of American consumption of 50 mineral commodities, a market valued at $32.3 billion annually. Of those 50, the U.S. was 100% import-dependent on 20, representing $1.3 billion. In 2015, the U.S. was half-dependent on 47 non-fuel mineral commodities and 100% reliant on 19 commodities.
Murkowski said at a committee hearing recently that this trend exposes the U.S. to potential supply shortages and price volatility, while also reducing international leverage and attractiveness for manufacturing.
“Instead of lessening our dependence, we are actually increasing our dependence,” she said. “We’re not making headway on this issue. … What are we doing wrong here?” Read more
Dean A. Pinkert is a partner in Hughes Hubbard’s International Trade practice. He is a former Commissioner of the U.S. International Trade Commission. Pinkert was nominated by President Bush and confirmed by the Senate in 2007, and was designated Vice Chairman by President Obama in 2014.
As a commissioner, Pinkert participated in numerous anti-dumping, countervailing duty, and safeguard investigations, including the special safeguard investigation of passenger tires that resulted in import relief for the domestic tire industry and was upheld by the World Trade Organization. He participated in an unprecedented number of final determinations in Section 337 investigations during his tenure, notably dissenting in an electronic devices case that went to President for policy review. President Obama, relying on many of the factors cited in the dissent, overruled the commission for the first time since 1987.
Former ITC Vice Chair A. Dean Pinkert. Source: Hughes Hubbard.
Pinkert spoke with MetalMiner Editor Jeff Yoders by phone about several issues facing metals producers and manufacturers, including global steel and aluminum overcapacity and how the new Trump administration can approach trade and overcapacity issues. This is part two of our discussion, which focuses on cases that rise to the WTO. See part one here if you missed it.
Jeff Yoders: Is there a risk to elevating any such case to the WTO of essentially spending the money and hiring the lawyers, only to lose the case?
Dean Pinkert: First, there are two types of cases. When there’s a decision by the U.S. Trade Representative‘s office to file a case with the WTO, we’ll call those offensive cases. They are filing a complaint with the WTO saying that another country is violating its trade commitments. By the way, I think the Obama administration was very aggressive at developing and filing cases of that kind.
There is another type, and these are what I was referring to earlier, where the U.S. has an investigation of something, concludes that a trade remedy is appropriate, imposes that trade remedy and then gets sued and it goes to the WTO. In 2002, when the steel safeguard relief was put into place, the U.S. was taken to the WTO by our trading partners and, ultimately, the WTO ruled against the safeguard. It was then withdrawn, although the Bush administration said the reason it was withdrawn was because it achieved its aim of giving the domestic industry some breathing space so that they could regain profitability, not because of the loss.
I was talking more about that more defensive posture in the WTO when I was talking about safeguards.
JY: There’s a lot of talk about a border-adjustment tax right now. Many policy papers are calling the scheme very similar to a value-added tax but only on companies. Is there a chance that such an idea might run afoul of WTO rules?
DP: We don’t now exactly what it would look like or what the final measure, if there is one, would be. We don’t know how the WTO would react to it, either, but it’s possible that the WTO would consider it an export subsidy and, if it did, then that would have some serious consequences because there is a list of various kinds of subsidies, particularly export subsidies, in the WTO agreement. If it was found to be an export subsidy there would be considerable consequences for the U.S.
But, it’s important to note that we don’t even know what the border adjustment tax will look like yet. We would have to see. Read more