• black and white metal beam matrix

    GET TWO ON US!

    Receive 2 monthly metal buying outlooks at no cost to you. Understand the market in which you’re buying. Formulate your 2016 strategy.

    Sign Up Now >
  • slider-annualoutlook-blue2016

    New Outlook Report

    Grab our NEW 2016 annual metals outlook report, updated for Q2 – budget, forecast, strategize.

    Free Download >

If you want a succinct analysis of activity or developments on the LME you have no further to look than posts by Thomson Reuters columnist Andy Home.

Two-Month Trial: Metal Buying Outlook

For years Home has bought clarity to the wider metal community around the goings on at London’s metals market. Often tinged with a certain witty tone, his observations are rarely off the mark. His latest article is no exception, reviewing the thorny question of how to justify the high cost of storing metal in a London Metal Exchange warehouse and the options the LME has to tackle what nearly all stakeholders agree is a long-running problem fraught with the risk of unintended consequences and the potential for legal challenges in multiple jurisdictions.

For a wider review check out the article link, but, in short, the conclusion is the LME’s preferred option is likely to be a rent cap. The alternative is changing the contract to free-on-truck, essentially wiping out load-out charges, a so-called nuclear option. It would have been fraught with risk of litigation under the multiple legal jurisdictions across the LME’s network.

Capping Rent: What is it Good For?

So, what would a rent cap do? In the short term, nothing. LME rents are so far above off-market rates the probable move to cap rent isn’t going to attract metal back into the LME system anytime soon. That, apparently, is part of the attraction. A rent cap does not constitute a dramatic change in the economics of warehouse operators’ business models.

However, the extent to which it does attract metal back in the future can only be a good thing for the LME and the market for each individual metal on the LME system becoming more visible as its movement can be tracked and gauged.

When the metal is off-market, it is invisible and large stock movements are probably occurring, with consequences for prices but with no way for the wider market to measure or understand those consequences. It may even have been driven in part by off-market movements of inventory, but we have little or no way of knowing if buy/sell trades on the LME are related to physical metal sitting in warehouses or are simply paper transactions.

Transparency is information and, for investors and traders, information is everything. Any move the LME makes that encourages financiers to store their metal in the LME system is a good thing. To remove the distortion that queues created is an added benefit that has, for the time being, largely already been achieved and was always a symptom of the financier’s game, anyway, not a direct cause of high physical delivery premiums.

Free Download: The July 2016 MMI Report

The LME’s efforts to control their warehouse operators’ activities have been going on since the market started. This is yet one more development in that ongoing process.

The Environmental Protection Agency‘s Clean Power Plan took another hit this week and ArcelorMittal, the world’s largest steel company, beat expectations with its Q2 filing.

Fifth Circuit Blocks Clean Power Plan ‘Haze Rule’

The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent block of the Environmental Protection Agency‘s regional haze plan for Texas and Oklahoma supports arguments that the agency overstepped its legal authority in crafting the overall Clean Power Plan, states challenging the rule told the D.C. Circuit on Wednesday.

We have extensively covered the clean power plan and its implications for U.S. manufacturers.

ArcelorMittal Beats Q2 Forecasts

ArcelorMittal, the world’s largest producer of steel, on Friday reported a better-than-expected core profit for the second quarter but kept its outlook for the full year unchanged. Core profit almost doubled in the second quarter compared to the same period last year to $1.77 billion, well above the $1.574 billion expected in Reuters poll of eight analysts.