gui yong nian/Adobe Stock

This morning in metals news, Canada is considering new tariffs or quotas to protect itself from steel diverted from the U.S., the U.S. goes at it with several WTO members and a major energy project in the U.S. is denied a tariff exclusion request.

Need buying strategies for steel? Try two free months of MetalMiner’s Outlook

Canada Considers Tariffs, Quotas

Canada could turn to tariffs or quotas as it looks to deal with the possibly of diverted steel from the U.S. (as a result of the U.S.’s Section 232 tariff).

As Bloomberg reported, Industry Minister Navdeep Bains said Canada is considering expansion of a previously announced list of products that could be subject to the safeguard measures (rebar, steel plates and energy tubular).

U.S. Challenges Retaliatory Tariffs at WTO

Several countries have responded to the U.S.’s steel and aluminum tariffs with retaliatory tariffs. The U.S.’s back-and-forth exchange of tariffs with China is the most high-profile example, but several other countries have also hit the U.S. with retaliatory tariffs of varying levels.

The U.S., however, is challenging those tariffs at the World Trade Organization (WTO), arguing they go against WTO rules, particularly referring to measures from China, the E.U., Canada, Mexico and Turkey, according to the South China Morning Post.

No Tariff Exclusion for Shale Pipeline Project

A $1.1 billion shale pipeline project was denied a steel tariff exclusion request, Reuters reported, marking the first such decision vis-a-vis a major energy project.

MetalMiner’s Annual Outlook provides 2018 buying strategies for carbon steel

The request from Plains All American Pipeline LP was denied because the Department of Commerce ruled the the company can find suitable products domestically.

The U.S. Department of Commerce. qingwa/Adobe Stock

The U.S. Department of Commerce launched a new investigation, under the aegis of the little-used but now ubiquitous Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, this time investigating imports of automobiles and automotive components.

Need buying strategies for steel? Try two free months of MetalMiner’s Outlook

Unsurprisingly, while no decisions have been made as of yet regarding the imposition of new tariffs, the investigation in and of itself has led to outcry from automakers. In fact, as part of the Department of Commerce review process, more than 2,300 public comments were submitted in relation to the Section 232 automotive probe.

So, now that all parties involved are all revved up, what’s next?

The Department of Commerce will hold public hearings on the issue, beginning Thursday, July 19, and concluding Friday, July 20.

The first day of the hearing will kick off at 8:30 a.m. and include testimony from individuals “representing domestic and international companies, industry groups, labor, and foreign countries.”

The full agenda can be found here.

Jennifer Thomas, vice president of federal governments affairs for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM), will be the first speaker Thursday. The AAM released a statement late last month in response to the Trump administration’s decision to look into auto imports.

“While we understand that the Administration is working to achieve a level playing field, tariffs are not the right approach,” the statement read. “Tariffs on autos and auto parts raise vehicle prices for all customers, limit consumer choice and invite retaliatory action by our trading partners. Automakers support reducing trade barriers across the board and achieving fairness through facilitating rather than inhibiting trade.”

The Association of Global Automakers (AGA) will be represented by President and CEO John Bozzella. In May, the AGA released its own statement.

MetalMiner’s Annual Outlook provides 2018 buying strategies for carbon steel

“Contrary to the assumption underlying the investigation on import vehicles, the U.S. auto industry is thriving,” the statement read. “To our knowledge no one is asking for this protection. If these tariffs are imposed, consumers are going to take a big hit because they will have fewer vehicle choices and higher car and truck prices. This course of action will undermine the health and competitiveness of the U.S. auto industry and invite retaliation by our trading partners.”